follow CCP

Recent blog entries
popular papers

What Is the "Science of Science Communication"?

Climate-Science Communication and the Measurement Problem

Ideology, Motivated Cognition, and Cognitive Reflection: An Experimental Study

'Ideology' or 'Situation Sense'? An Experimental Investigation of Motivated Reasoning and Professional Judgment

A Risky Science Communication Environment for Vaccines

Motivated Numeracy and Enlightened Self-Government

Ideology, Motivated Cognition, and Cognitive Reflection: An Experimental Study

Making Climate Science Communication Evidence-based—All the Way Down 

Neutral Principles, Motivated Cognition, and Some Problems for Constitutional Law 

Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus
 

The Tragedy of the Risk-Perception Commons: Science Literacy and Climate Change

"They Saw a Protest": Cognitive Illiberalism and the Speech-Conduct Distinction 

Geoengineering and the Science Communication Environment: a Cross-Cultural Experiment

Fixing the Communications Failure

Why We Are Poles Apart on Climate Change

The Cognitively Illiberal State 

Who Fears the HPV Vaccine, Who Doesn't, and Why? An Experimental Study

Cultural Cognition of the Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology

Whose Eyes Are You Going to Believe? An Empirical Examination of Scott v. Harris

Cultural Cognition and Public Policy

Culture, Cognition, and Consent: Who Perceives What, and Why, in "Acquaintance Rape" Cases

Culture and Identity-Protective Cognition: Explaining the White Male Effect

Fear of Democracy: A Cultural Evaluation of Sunstein on Risk

Cultural Cognition as a Conception of the Cultural Theory of Risk

« Group conflict and risk perceptions: two accounts | Main | Don't make free, reasoning people choose between learning posterior predictive model checking & *being who they are*! »
Thursday
Nov272014

Liberals trust in Supreme Court plummets! Less than 25% of them would agree to have Steve Breyer housesit for them when they want on vacation!e

Actually, I think all we can say is that neither liberals nor consersvatives hold the U.S. Supreme Court in as high regard as they both hold scientists.

But the Court shouldn't feel bad.  Nearly everyone is less respected than scienitstis.

 

 

 

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (7)

Didn't Justice Breyer get robbed in his own vacation home by a machete-wielding home invader?

http://www.cnn.com/2012/02/13/us/justice-breyer-robbed/

November 28, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterSteve Sailer

OK, people can not hold the Supreme Court in high regard. But what is the alternative? Ferguson? Venezuela? North Korea? Feudalism with us as the feudal lords?

November 28, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterEric Fairfield

@Eric

I don't think we can learn much from these data.

November 28, 2014 | Registered CommenterDan Kahan

The most interesting thing in the graph is that "hardly any" confidence has a big spike right after Roe v. Wade which then goes away almost instantly from 76-77. Then with liberals "a great deal" has a pretty long lasting bump after Roe but barely changes with conservatives. Also interesting is that Roe seems to have had a temporary but radical affect on conservatives. The spike in hardly any drew directly from a great deal, it wasn't a linear slide back. I think there is also a connection with the long slide down in liberal confidence connected with the 2000 Bush v. Gore decision.

December 2, 2014 | Unregistered CommenterRyan

@Ryan-- yeah interesting to try to guess why peaks 7u valleys happen.

But doesn't it look like the happen in tandem for libs conservs? That essentially it is only intercept that is shifting & not difference?

That would make me think the movement is as likely to be related to some global effect on how rspts at time were rating all institutions 7 not necessarily antying S Ct did (maybe even some change in survey modality, although GSS has been pretty consistent about methods)

December 2, 2014 | Registered CommenterDan Kahan

@Ryan--

In fact, check out the "Confidence in ..." graphics in this post for "major companies": same dip in "hardly any" at same time as for "Supreme court." so can't be Roe v. Wade (unless you think that affected confidence in multiple institutions, including ones having nothing to w/ law)

This is actually the major point of that very post-- that one has to look at *all* the data from "Confidence in ..." to draw inferences from variance in any 1 item!

December 3, 2014 | Registered CommenterDan Kahan

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>